[g_podcast id="14832176"]

In this episode, I talk to doctor, author and seminar leader Dr. Rüdiger Dahlke about the options we all have to protect ourselves from viruses and other infections, and about which far too little information is provided.
We also talk about:

• Politics and corona reporting
• Why vaccination may not be the right solution
• What we can do to increase our defenses
• How fear weakens the immune system
• Which chronic diseases have effective natural cures

JuliaI am very pleased to have Dr. Rüdiger Dahlke as my guest today. Welcome Dr. Dahlke!

Dr. Dahlke: Greetings to all listeners.

JuliaI am very pleased that you have taken the time to join us. Today we want to talk about the intestines and immune system, nutritionand and to cover a range of topics.
I think the dominant topic of late has been corona and this crisis thatit has caused. You've also talked a lot about - not just about health issues - but also about shadows and the shadow principle, for example. What can we learn from this crisis from this perspective? What do you think? What does it want to tell us?

The government is ill-advised

Dr. Dahlke: I think we need to learn to lean much more on Mother Nature again and really distance ourselves from the state data-contrast="auto">. What we have experienced now is quite unique in my life. This disenfranchisement with arguments thatshouldactually provoke a thinking person.Every doctor has to understand that it can't work like this. You can't just keep adding up the numbers of illnesses and infections. Imagine doing that with cancer or heart attacks! You have an incredibly huge number in November and people are trembling with fear that they will get cancer.
At times I had the impression that the Robert Koch Institute only knewbasicaddition. You have to differentiatebetween"diedof" and"died with corona". If you're talking about this doubling factor - like Mrs. Merkel, she's a physicist, she can't be completely ignorant of logic- then you have to know what it is and what it means and not, as soon aswereach the target, simply forget it and use the R-factor, which she probably never understood.
Andit has to be said, even before the shutdown - clearly, days days before the shutdown - it was already in the target range, below 1, but to this day it has not been understood: We have to get it back above 1, because ultimately we need an infestation. It wasn't until the third campaign that it came out:"Nothing can be done until we have a vaccine. There's nothing we can do." I have to say: that was honest for once. Now I know who Mrs. Merkel means when she says"we":herself and the pharmaceutical industry, and the alarmists, those virologists who were sowrong about swine flu and their panic.
Otherwise, it's a very thin story. The whole complementary medicine, the whole naturopathy, cando so muchnow.But if you suggest it, you're immediately vilified and insultedby the media. Dou're all in the same boat in this situation. It's unspeakable. Those who correctly predicted what the swine flu would be and what wouldcome out of itare now not being listened to again. They are once again listening to those they listened to back then, who have no idea.
I mean, an employee who makes the same mistake so blatantly twice would be dismissed. But the Germansdon't seem towant to dismiss Mrs. Merkel. They want to have this intellectual misery once again. She is incredibly popular. Well, that will be the reason why this is continuing. There is no longer any reason for this whole mass shutdown story.
In Berlin, over 200,000 people demonstrated against racism without observing any social distancing rules. I was at a demonstration with 7,500 people. You couldn't tell exactly. They kept their distance, it was a huge crowd. So, if the horror stories they always paint on the wall were true, we would have had a catastrophe in Berlin long ago. But we haven't. And that was some time ago. These demonstrations have been going on for a long time. The population - and that's the nice thing - is waking up.
Yes, there are many people who are now realizing: The Basic Law is actually important to me. Before, there was disenchantment with politics. Politicians always complained about that. Now many people are interested in their basic rights and would like to have them back quickly, especially as thereis no reason to withhold them any longer.
Many things have also had a positive effect. I hope that we are not returning to normality, but that we are returning to a new realization. If we are honest, we now have a choice. Do we want to be afraid of the second wave now? Do we want to let some flu virus - there are always flu viruses - sweep us away once or twice a year? A flu virus that some rulers - and I can no longer call them anything else, our politicians - instrumentalize in order to once again achievean almost feudalistic balance of power.
For the doctors, I have to be honest: I have received so many letters and requests for me to post something. I have sometimes made contributions, but not nearly as many as I had. That's actually good news. A lot of doctors have woken up. The President of the World Medical Associationsaid: "Shutdown, that's nonsense." The German doctors' president said: "Shutdown..."
The actually have almost all of them with expertise from their advisory staff there above excluded. Now a banker and a vet essentially determine policy. So, I wouldn'tthinktoo much of"banksters" now.There are a fewnice exceptions. I've also had the pleasure of getting to know them. But vets ... I hope they're not all on the same level as the head of the RKI.

Making peace with the pathogens

From my point of view, we really only have one choice now: either we get vaccinated and tracked every year and are completely monitored. That's what they're planning now. Or we realize something that we should have known for 100 years and that can be scientifically proven: We are boosting our immune system. We protect ourselves by building up our defensesand allowing ourselves to be stimulated more by life than by pathogens.
That also has a meaning. An infection, if you translate that, is a conflict, a war between the immune system and pathogens. We could make peace. It's simple: a plant-based, wholesome diet - I didn't call it"peace food" by chance - is scientifically proven to lower CRP levels, the C-reactive protein, the marker for inflammation.
Fasting,that too. I would advise fasting for a week. Then switch to a wholefood, plant-based diet, make peace with your immune system, build it up properly and also make peace with these pathogens. We willnever have a germ-free situation, because then all life would be dead.
We have ten times as many germs in the gut as cells in the body.Gastroenterology says the same thing today. Thank goodness they have finally discovered the gut. I think we have Giulia Enders to thank for this with her book "Darm mit Charme"(Intestine with charm).
I would like to see something similar developed for the respiratory system, the lungs. Then we could use the possibilities of connected breathing in a completely different way. The pulmonologists are still"unawakened". But gastroenterologists have now discovered the intestine.Well 2000 years after Hippocrates, who already said:"Death is in the gut". FX Mayr, the Austrianfasting doctor, has taken this up again."Death is in the gut." And thank goodness, because those who have picked up on this now know things like: Parkinson's starts in the gut.
Until now, Parkinson's was in the neurologists' box. The gut wasin the gastroenterologists' box. Andso we have different specialties that hardly ever confer with each other.That's why access to Parkinson's couldn't be created, but now it is.The gut is thelargestpart of the immune system. It is crucial. It's a gateway where things get into us. It's also skin, only internal. Mucous membranes and so on. We really have the choice of doing many useful things.

Politics, the pharmaceutical industry and Bill Gates

On the one hand, I was pleased to hear Mrs. Merkel say: "We can't do anything", because for once she honestly said who "we" are: probably her and the sponsors, or I don'tknow why sheis so close to the industry. Perhaps also for the sake of her good friend Bill Gates. Friendship is a beautiful thing.I don't know what's reallybehind it. But by"we"she means the pharmaceutical industry and herself and her whisperer and her RKI institute, whichin my opinionshould first go back to elementary school.
There are far too many people who simply see through it. Abraham Lincoln said it so well:"You can fool all the people for a while. You can fool some of the people all of the time. But you can never fool all of the people for all of the time." That will come up at some point.It will dawn on more and more people:This is a repeat of the swineflu Inscenario. However, it has to be said that COVID-19 much more dangerous than the swine flu story back then. Like a flu, a more severe one, I would say. I mean,"like the flu" doesn't mean it's harmless. Because flu ...

Julia: Flu is also dangerous.

Protection from infection

Dr. Dahlke: We have so many things - I really wrote this book"Protection against infections" in no time at all. Eight days, seven nights almost. I had around 100 studies in there that prove it: Wait a minute, forest bathing increases natural killer cells, so important. Walking barefoot is better than buying antioxidants. It's very, very good to get your gut in order. I've been doing a proper clean-up, making friends with our symbionts - incredibly important - for decades with a multi-fermented preparation from an old pharmacist in Bavaria.
There are so many things. We even know that meditation - thanks toJonKabat-Zinn, this has now been scientifically proven - thatmindfulness really does strengthen and boost the immune system. We now have so many things: good sleep is important. We can do so much. I experience that too. I've been doing it for a long time.
For example, we havea forest hallright now.If you have a whole week's seminar in the forest, then you've strengthened your natural killer cells, which are so important in the fight against viruses, for months.
All these vitamins: Vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin A. So many studies have proven this. We also have a study from Corona that says: If your vitamin D level is above 50 nmol, it's actually in a safe range. If you get below that, the less vitamin D - or"hormone D" from the sun - you have, the worse. And those who had very little - that's 87 percent of Germans - are in a very bad position. And if you lock them up at home and deprive them of the sun and the forest and the fresh air in spring, which is what kills every flu epidemic, then of course it's particularly bad.

Julia: Yes, yes, and also contact with others. The more you include yourselfssand have no contact, the less our immune system can work because it is not challenged at all.

Caution with vaccination

Dr. Dahlke: But we already know so much about our immune system.For example, I havehundreds of studies on vaccination. Once you've read them, you'll never have the idea of simply getting a flu shot or something like that.

Julia: Why not? Can you perhaps briefly explain why not?

Dr. Dahlke: Well, if you get a flu shot, the probability of getting the next flu is increased. We can prove that. If you have a flu vaccination, against influenza A, B etc., then the likelihood of contracting coronaviruses - the ones that have been discovered so far,so farCOVID-19 -the likelihood of catching something from it is quadrupled.
Thereisalsoa studyon thisin"Protection against infections".It was done with children. So, we really do know an astonishing amount today,including about the disadvantages of vaccination. If you go through mumps, if you go through measles, it reduces your likelihood of getting melanoma, this really dangerous black skin cancer.Italso reduces thelikelihood of getting leukemiain children.Vaccination doesn't do that. It has to be the"wild form" of measles. Then this protection is given. It is similar with mumps. We know today that if we prevent many childhood diseases through vaccination, wepayfor it with cancer.People should realize this for once.

JuliaBut why is this not recognized? Why are we immediately labeled as"Vaccination opponents" or"conspiracy theorists" orsimilar when you talk about such connections?

Dr. Dahlke: Yes, I can't back that up with scientific studies. The studies are solid. " The majority of them arepeer-reviewed studies. But whythey don't get any PR at all, whythey don't come into the public eye, that could only be explained by a conspiracy. A conspiracy of the pharmaceutical industry, the vaccination industry, against the health of the population.Similar to how Robert Kennedy Jr. portrays it.

Julia: Can anyone see these studies?Could anyonewho is interested find these studies?

Dr. Dahlke: Yes, they are published in books and you could find them. Sometimes you have topay a littleforstudiesto be able to read them, but most of them, to be honest, are not.
Sometimes you can have a clue.For example,if youknowthatin the 90s of the last century, Der Spiegel called Bill Gatesa "monster" because of hisviolationsof antitrust law. He had to pay millions in fines. But he wanted to monopolize it. And he succeeded. Der Spiegel [unintelligible] a monster.
Then in 2012 or 2013, Der Spiegeloncewrotereally drastically about its vaccination campaigns in India, which it had already carried out via the WHO at the time.A lot of girlsthere werepersuaded to be vaccinated , but then not only polio was vaccinated - which incidentally triggered a huge polio epidemic. The WHO has admitted that 70 percent of polio cases were caused by the vaccination. >But theyalso tried tosterilizethe girlsat the same time as vaccinating them.Many were harmed by this. Der Spiegel made an incredible fuss about it and quiterightly so.Seven years and 2.5 million dollars later, Der Spiegel is also totally Bill Gates-compliant.If you are making a connection, that is an insinuation. But the facts are very clear. In my opinion, an editor at Der Spiegel has to ask himself the same question. Many journalists should ask themselves: What's wrong with them?
There is a medical ethosthat hasn't beentrampled on for so long.Mygrandfather, who was also a doctor, still believed in"Primum nil nocere". "Above all, do no harm." Then the whole vaccination story would have to be reconsidered. But KennedyJr. proved that.The industry had to admit it in court: 30 years of no success controls.They can't even say that it helps. What wecan seefrom studiesis what harm it does.
Well, in this respect you have to say that it's probably like they say in Bavaria:"He who pays, creates." It follows the money. I mean, we've seen that now with coronavirus. Everything is ultimately subordinated to this policy.
Even the churches are cowering, witha few exceptions. There was a Protestant pastor who once let loose a secular sermon of rage. I posted it too. Or, more nuanced, Jürgen Fliege. Over 50,000 people watchediton Facebook or Telegram.There's already one at couple. Or a fewconservative Catholic cardinals, for whom it has also become too colorful. They also expressed their displeasure very directly about what was going on. I mean, it was also deeply unchristian to simply leave old people, even dying people, alone, tolock them up,eat in the corridor, or else go to prison.
So, I mean, so many shadows came out of what you mentioned at the beginning. Politicians have never been concerned with health,otherwise they would finally ban vets from sellingantibiotics to farmers on their own account.We have 20-30,000 deathsa year in Germany due to resistant germs .That is a disaster. Comparable to the worst flu experience two and a half years ago. But nothing is being done. Doctors are not allowed to simply sell antibiotics. Pharmacies do that.Then it could be better controlled. But the misery caused by these resistant germs is appalling.
These are phenomena that we find in nature. Both bacteria and viruses are very adaptable. We humans are too, by the way. We can adapt to all kinds of obstacles, and viruses do the same. An infectiologist - a specialist in vaccinations - such as Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, warned against the swine flu vaccination and was right. It has triggered Guillain-Barré syndrome, i.e. paralysis, inmany people. In the USA, the vaccination campaign was canceled because of these horrific side effects. In our country, entire hospital workforces refused to be vaccinated. In the end, it was also a scandal that the politicians were given avaccine that was much more harmlessin terms of adjuvants than the general public, a serum that did not cause such drastic side effects. These are all things that you can still understand today by watching the movie"Profiteers of Fear".

The dark side of the shutdown

We have a very transparent,clear data-contrast="auto"> situation and can of course also see how many connections there are. We can also go back a long way in time. We have the latest research on this, but we also have old experiences. I think we've both already decided what we want: we'd rather strengthen our defenses than have a shutdown.
I don't think the economy will go along with that either. If you drive it to the wall every year like you are doing now, then only the pharmaceutical industry and only the vaccination industrywill survive.The question is, what will they live on when everyone is broke? If youcompletely blind to collateral damage. An acquaintance, a doctor from Orlando, Florida, tells me that they now have more suicides in a month - unfortunately - than they usually have in a year. I hear the same thing from San Francisco, California.
That's quite dramatic. We know from Wuhan how much depressionthere was, how many panic attacks, how many sleep disorders andalsohow much domestic violence.When people perhaps no longer like each other that much. If they onlyeat and watch TVin the evening, that's fine. But if they lock them up together for 16 weeks, then it'smurder and manslaughter. I hope it doesn't get that bad. So, a lot has happened. People don't get happy from money, but they kill themselves for money.
On Black Friday, 1929:how many people killed themselves just because of money? I hope we'll be spared that now.It all looks like we're going to suffer the consequences of the shutdown. In my opinion, our psychologically unadvised, uninformed politicians, I don't think they know what fear is. I have to accuse them of naivety. A Drosten like that just sees viruses and his panic numbers. I don't think Mrs. Merkel has any idea what triggers fear.

Fear weakens the immune system

JuliaWhat triggers fear? Can you explain that? Well, I knowssthat fearfor example shuts down the immune system. What are the consequences of anxiety?

Dr. Dahlke: Panic attacks areof coursea consequence of fear. Incidentally, we've had them since the EU banned all farm slaughter. Small butchers are no longer allowed to slaughter. Onlylarge slaughterhouses, where the animals queuefor half an hour before the killing box in the slaughter aisle. Thenthey all release a fear, stress and panic hormone. Theseneurotransmitters are the same in mammals. So, many who eat animal protein, meat, eat anxiety. Since then we have had panic attacks. That wasn't even an issue when I was studying. Austriahad panic attacks at exactly the same time as we later joined the EU.These are things that you might notice.
There is a simple study that I like to quote here, by a Professor Schröter from Frankfurt, University of Frankfurt/Oder.It's about what every doctor knows. I only very rarely. If you prescribe beta-blockers to men and inform them properly, you'll reap a disaster. That's why I didn't inform them properly, I have to be honest. I've only very, very rarely prescribed it once to bridge a short period of time. But if you take 100 men and don't inform them aboutthe side effects of beta blockers, you'll end up with 102 men who have erectile dysfunction, an impotence disorder. But if you tell them - and say it defensively - that in rare cases they could have an impotence problem, then 30 of the 100 men will have symptoms of impotence. That's a good example of how it works. Two out of 100 get it because of the pharmacology of the beta blocker. But 28 get it because of anxiety.
Mrs. Merkel, butalsoMr. Kurz here in Germany, have chosen a classic, easy-to-see-through scenario,spreading insanefear and panic. That people have to die. Their court reporters essentially only brought coffins and horror stories. People were terrified. Then the same press made fun of the people. Panic buying, toilet paper sold out in Germany, condoms in France and wine in Spain.And the guns. In March there were85 percent more gun sales in the USA. That's quite classic. If you scare Americans, they want to arm themselves. And Germans are just scared, and you need a lot of toilet paper. And Austria is quite close to the Germans in this respect.
They have brought aboutmany other things - I don't know if they wanted to. In Austria - I remember the figures - there were 15,000 infections and more than 30,000 denunciations. So the old Blockwart system is coming out again. I don'tknow if that's what they wanted. But that's what they did.

JuliaYes, here in Spain too. Well, it was massive. Someone from the police even told me that they were getting calls every day from people saying:"My neighbor is out with the dog.ssout with the dog and hasn't come back yet" or something something. That was very, very noticeable.

Dr. Dahlke: The culmination of Merkel's fear-mongering was then, after they were all in a panic, after they had been made fun of, to then say:"We can't do anything. Until the vaccination."

Julia: That's also such a suggestion. It's like saying that if you take a beta blocker, you might get problems. It's the same thing. Of course, if you now say:"Only when we have the vaccine will we be safe." That's also like programming people.

Dr. Dahlke: Yes, that's probably the intention. That's the vaccination policy. Gates says that very directly. Drosten too, very directly. They want to push through another vaccination like the swine flu, which already had so many side effects. They also crammed it through in 18 months or less. And because they can already see the side effects coming. It's still being paid for.Merkel has - and this is not the firsttime - caused a million-dollar disaster with vaccinations that nobody needed. They couldn't even be sold to the Third World.
In the end, they had to be disposed of at great expense. A disaster. But they're already planning it again. And because they expectthese side effects, both Drosten and Bill Gates are also suggesting that the state should pay for the damage. must take over, must pay for it."The state" is of course always the citizens. The Germans already know that. Mrs. Merkelalso once said:"The nuclear industry must dismantle the nuclear power plants." My ass. Of course the citizens are paying now. They have long since shirked their responsibility. A German who is bright is actually used to this.
Kurz has been in government for too short a time. We haven't seen anything yet, but it's actually like a blueprint. He has already deliberatelystarteda panic.There's also this unspeakable sentence - which has been exposed - that couldn't be more wrong:"Every Austrian will know someone who has died of coronavirus." I only know Austrians who don't know anyone whohasever been affected by coronavirus. The reality is this:in Augsburg, 300,000 people had seven infections and then one got really sick. So now they're wearing masks for the 15th or 16th week. And all this with Mr. Söder, who at the beginning wanted to save the Bavarian carnival and of course ultimately also has to take responsibility for it.

The "miracle of Denmark"

Vaccination fatigue is gone,people are afraid and in their fear they are becoming more and more compliant and tractable.And onceagain: we can also go back 100 years. We would have a wonderful solution template. The First World War was 100 years ago, in 1917. Denmark was blockaded, and a country that was so focused on livestock farming and milk production was facing amajor famine. The government sought advice from a doctor, Dr.Mikkel Hindhede- one of my"stars ". He advised them that"either the people muststarveor the pigsmuststarve". They sold the pigs, including alarge proportion of the dairy cows, and convinced the population to eat a plant-based diet - which was automatically wholesome at the time data-contrast="auto">. And Denmark did not suffer a famine. The Lancet, the renowned medical journal of 100 years ago, also recognized and described this.
And then the Spanish flu hit Europe in 1918 and caused a disaster.There were over 20 million deaths in Europe. Over 25 million in total. Again, they probably didn't count the poorest countries. Terrible. Quite incomparable to anything we've ever experienced with influenza. But Denmark has experienced the"miracle of Denmark". They were now on a plant-based diet. Not all of them. There was milk, there was meat, but it was very, very expensive. The rich and the stupid - that's not always the same thing, but in this case - they continued to eat it. However, Denmarkdid not have an increased mortality rateduring the Spanish flu, as we did in Austria, Germany andSwitzerland. We don't have increased curves with what is called"excess mortality". Just as a Wodarg, aSucharit Bhakdi, a Hongartz, a Mrs. Mölling andmany, many otherspredicted.
So, in this respect, we could say:Why don't wetry to orient ourselves on such things? Why not becomethe "miracle of Germany"? With a change that everyone can start with themselves. I haven't taken part in flu epidemics for 40 years. I don't takepart in them.I just eat awholefood, plant-based diet,this peace food approach, and I would advise everyone to do the same.
Of course, we could just become more, and if we become more, then we won't have to worry about the second wave. Then there won't be a second wave and there won't be a COVID-20, -21, -22 or -23, because that's what the vaccination strategy is designed for.

Everyonehas the opportunity to protect themselves

JuliaYes, it's already being programmed again: The second wave will come. It's almost like a suggestion or a kind of hypnosis that we're being talked into. Then, of course, it's clear what they've designed it for.

Dr. Dahlke: It was never about health.

JuliaNo.

Dr. Dahlke: Otherwise they would have done something about hospitalism, something about the resistant germs. Thenthey would have taken care of the old people and not just locked them away in solitude. That's the most terrible thing you can do. They would also have done something for the at-risk patients.
I posted videos on Facebook, I think, or on Telegram. You can get out of obesity. I've already helped so many people, now through these online stories. A few thousand again in spring: ideal weight challenge, online fasting. You can get out of it. You can turn high blood pressure back into normal pressure. You can get rid of metabolic syndrome, the insulin resistance that leads to type 2 diabetes, with a different diet.

Julia: That's what I do with my clients. At the end of the day, it's really about getting away from the sugar highs and lows and eating an anti-inflammatory diet. That really helps a lot.

Dr. Dahlke: Yes. And we have some wonderful examples. Of course, we can not only work the"miracle of Germany", but we could also work Europe ... the world! We could conceivably work a world miracle. We would have so many positive side effects. Cancer rates would go down, heart attacks ...

JuliaOf course. Diabetes.

Dr. Dahlke : If we included psychosomatics, then we would respect fear more and probably wouldn't cause so much fear. I also believe that people like Mrs. Merkel and Prof. Drosten actually deserve compassion. They too will look back on their lives at some point, hopefully before their deathbeds, but there at the latest. You have to ask yourself: What did they do? What did they do? What have you done?
If you think about the collateral damage that has been caused, then in my view the damage caused by the actions of politicians far outweighs the benefits. The benefits are debatable. The damages are simply facts. That is a difficult situation.
Your work, mywork, is a beautiful job, a satisfying one. I'll be 69 next month, I still enjoy doing it and I've also come out of my vacation mood and vacation mood in Cyprus out ssenand wrote a book that wasn't planned, apart from [unintelligible].A publisher brought it out in three weeks. That was also a nice experience to see for once: It works.
And so many positive things too. I hope we don't get back to this normality and don't fixate on this, in my view, dangerous vaccination policy that's going on because it's just going to be an RNA vaccine - that'sobviouslyBill Gates' favorite model - and because it's obviously being waved through far too quickly and without safety precautions. We have the bad experience.There is nopoint inpoliticians representing the interests of the pharmaceutical industry and the vaccination industry in this way. I think we can say that quite clearly after this story.
Many doctors are now united in this. Professor Bhakdi came very close to me with his charming, coherent statements about this situation. But he is pro-measles vaccination.Against COVID-19 vaccination, it has to be said. We don't agree on everything in terms of content.

Intolerance and denunciations

Julia: You don't have to be, and I think that's where I see a huge discrepancy at the moment. That people say:"I'll only talk to you if you agree with me. And if you don't agree with me, then you're persona non grata for me." It seems to me that we have forgotten how to listen to different points of view and ultimately form our own opinion. And yet I can still end up being friends with them, even if they perhaps don't share my philosophy. This"I can only be friends with you if you agree with me. If you don't agree with me, then I'll remove you from my friends list" ... I have the feeling that this is happening very often and very extremely at the moment. I knowss where this stubbornness comes from. It's almost as if we're no longer mentally flexible at all. I have formed my opinion and no longer look to the right or left, because anything that doesn't fit in with this opinion is a conspiracy or is wrong or is ... Have you also noticed that this is the case at the moment?

Dr. Dahlke: Even in the spiritual scene. There are actually people - or at least there is supposed to be - who have called for this snitch.de.Someone who data-contrast="auto"> as a spiritual teacher calls for denunciation. I can't really imagine that. That would be so undergroundly pathetic. But people have already told me that several times. It's really extremely sad. I don't know how to explain something like that to myself ss. This is someone I think is intelligent.
But probably scared again. Really obviously afraid. But that's also something positivethatwe can take away from this. I think ithas dawned onmanypeoplefor the first time that our existence is finite. That life comes to an end and that nothing is as certain as death. That is also something that makes life so liberating. Once you have"reconciled" yourself to the fact that youhave to dieat some point, you can really start living. Then you can makeyour"list in front of the box" and then you could watch a movie like"The best comes at the end". Then the conclusion afterwards is not sadness, but actually the joy of not having a cancer diagnosis yet, not having to wait until one comes, not having to wait until the chemotherapy has failed, as is usually the case. Instead, we could start living right away. Then the best would come straight away. I hope there will be abigawakening.
I actually only know people who don't wantto be tracked. Who don't want to have something initiated so that it lights up when they are vaccinated. They don't want to be vaccinated at all because they are intelligent enough to interpret such studies.

JuliaAnd yet there is a reason why this crisis has come about. If you really look at it from a spiritualspiritual perspective - or whatever we want to call it - there must be a reason why this crisis has come about. If I am interpreting your books correctly, we are not victims, but ultimately everything that happens has something to do with us. What does it have to do with us that these things are happening now and that we are now to be ruled over, for example? What have we done to make this happen?

Dr. Dahlke: Then there 's guilt again. Iwould see responsibility. But some things are obvious. If you've experienced a disappointment, that's the"<span data-contrast="auto">End of a deception".
If I have now had someone as a friendwho calls for denunciation, I must take that as a serious disappointment. Then I feel sorry for him. I don't have to call him names because of it. But I do feel very sorry for him.That 's no basis for a friendship with me if you not only denounce, but also call for denunciation.
I am very grateful that I never experienced a war, living in Germany, Austria or Cyprus.We are the first generation not to have experienced war. And this whole Blockwart system, that I should inform on my neighbors, that's similar to what many Germans experienced with the Gestapo and the Stasi. It's a huge disappointment that something like that comes up. Yes,I have to be preparedfor that.It's still there. The block guards aresimplyin hiding. But they'll be out in a minute. Okay, we should know that. This danger has not been averted.
And we should also know that: You canmakemistakes.I even tell my employees:"Be brave! Go ahead and make a mistake once! But not twice." I wouldn't let anyemployee get away with what Ms. Merkel did regarding swine flu and COVID-19.That is not acceptable. So you have to learn from your mistakes. In this respect, it's also an opportunity.
Ultimately, you can also apologize once in a while. I once quoted from the Daily Mirror during the coronavirus period. That was a mistake because it's not a serious newspaper to quote from as a doctor. But I didn't let it go.The content it was right.A study by the American army has shown -there's a children's study, I've already said that - that the probability of getting coronavirusafter a flu vaccination quadruples. But there is also evidence of many other frightening things in connection with vaccination.

Is the press still free?

I'm also glad that I've looked into this in more depth, read another book on the subject and looked at many, many studies. That did me good. I have to say that it is of course bad if we have lostthe fourth pillar of the state - the free press, which is critical and pays attention. We have lost that.I do say data-contrast="auto"> no longer "public-law", I already say "public-unlawful" to them . What they arecurrently doing is wrong.
The third pillaris the free judiciary, whichisindependent. The Minister of the Chancellor's Office- who unfortunately also seems to have been a doctor in the past - is attacking the judges because they are notsupporting these unconstitutionalgovernment measures, but are instead invoking the Basic Law. This has happened more and more. The doctors and lawyers can already say that there is still a lot of light in their ranks.There arepeople who are awake. The journalists - that must be horrible! To be a journalist in such a mainstream medium.They can't all be so stupid that they don't know what's going on. I also know a few who simply play along with this farce out of fear of losing their job.That's a real shame. A lot of really good journalists have, of course, also left the public broadcasters. And I amfor for them! We need a public service press, television, etc. It would just have to be legal.

Why don't we hear anything about natural healing methods?

Fine, but now let's take a look: What do we get out of it? What does it mean to us? Well, it spurred me on to write books. First this"Protection against infections", but before that: there was an unspeakable report on ORF. That's the ARD in Austria. They really spent 40 or 50 minutes saying:"Alzheimer's is hopeless. There's nothing you can do. At best, a bit of mental exercise at the end. That can slow it down."
However, I had already been aware of a study by Dale Bredesen for years, who got nine out of ten Alzheimer's patients in various stages back to health through lifestyle changes and only significantly improved one. This is the University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles, arenowneduniversity in the USA. I was familiar with the Finger study from Finland, where they overcame and achieved so much with 200 participants through lifestyle changes for Alzheimer's.Bredesen writes that this one research focus - the beta-amyloid and the Alzheimer's toxin and plaques -on the the conventional medicineis that this is at best one of 36 points. So, you can imagine - as Mr. Bredesen says -"a roof with 36 holes" and they try to plug one up. That won't change the situation.
I then wrote"Old age as a gift"and also added the spiritual level. That's my thing. We don't have a choice as to whether we become like children again, as it says in the Bible.It literally says:"Unless you repent and become like children again, you cannot attain the kingdom of heaven." Not many people are interested in that today.Unfortunately, I think so.
What happens then? We don't have the choice of becoming like children again. We have the choice as to whether we become childlike - in the best sense, according to the astonished eyes of Saint-Exupéry's"Little Prince". We have the choice of whether we let our inner child participate in our lives again or whether we become childish, and that is what we call Alzheimer's disease. I would advise this so urgently:Let's become childlike andenjoylife from a child's perspective. Marvel.Like in"Harold & Maude",that movie,Maude, the foolish old woman lives. It's wonderful!
We could learn so much from movies, for example. I evenwrotea book with my first wife:"Hollywood Therapy: What movies reveal about our souls". We could really learn to experience the inner child in a movie like"The Kid" with Bruce Willis. That would be such a blessing for us. Today, at 69, I'm quite happy that I've prescribed a lot more movies than pharmaceuticals. Much more!
They haveno side effects. So, I didn't prescribe horror movies. This is the subject of"Hollywood therapy". We would havemany possibilities there.We coulddo so many wonderful thingsout of a situation like that.
The same with cancer. That was so provocative for me, what is said about it in public and on television. The reality is much, much more hopeful - but not in terms ofconventional medicine. And that's how"Krebs - Wachstum auf Abwegen" came about.
We also learn a lot from it. And collectively, we can say to ourselves, as I said at the beginning: everyone can createthe"miracle of Denmark" withinthemselves. But we could all also create the"miracle of Europe". Then it would be like that old hippie phrase that's still in my head:"Imagine there's a war and nobody goes." -"Imagine it's the second wave ...Imagine it's COVID-20, -25, -37 and nobody goes."
We don't need that. We are fit. We eat sensibly. We fast once or twice a year and get our CRP, our inflammation marker, down. Interleukin-6 andall these researched factors that cause our bodies to go haywire. We can do that today.

JuliaYes. Exactly.

Dr. Dahlke: Start with such simple things. Fasting is the fountain of youth today. Professor Valter Longo says so. After four days, your immune system is40 percentstronger.We know so much today. We know,for example, that in the intestines -where the immune system is huge - there are lots of lymphocytes on these very delicate surfaces that build up our defenses.For example, we now know from research that theSul data-contrast="auto">foraphane, i.e. those in broccoli, for example, or in Brussels sprouts or carfiol (cauliflower), that they havesomething like a key. Theyunlock it. Then the immune system in the gut really kicks in. It would be really, really good to use these things.
I read a long study, in English too. Pages long. Broccoli and the substances in it are"anti-cancer". At the very end they write that you shouldn't get your hopes up yet.It will be years before this is repeated and before the pharmaceutical industry uses it to produce common drugs. I always think in a situation like this: how stupid are people to accept something like this? They could just say:"Eat broccoli! Eat lots of cabbage!" They contain these sulforaphanes. They're really worth their weight in gold. The fart smells a bit disreputable - like sulphur - but that's a good thing.Sulforaphane- that'sthe sulphur in there, the sulphur.

JuliaYes, exactly.

Dr. Dahlke: You don't have to make it somehow esoteric and spiritual. I don't think esotericism is an insult. I've been meditating since I was 11. I'm very happy about it and I hope I'll continue to do it until the end. But you can also look at it this way.

JuliaI just think you've already listed so many things to strengthen the immune system. The more sides you can approach it from, the better. Everyone has to find out for themselves: What is my path and what is good for me? One person might say they go meditating and the next might go into the forest. Ultimately, everything has the same goal. I think we can really approach it from so many different angles so that everyone can find their own approach.

Using synergies

Dr. Dahlke: Of course, we can also bring these many things together in terms of synergies. The whole is more than the sum of its parts.That's what the EPIC study showedfor conventional medical factors. Of course, that is also the case. When I think of Tamanga think - our plant-based, wholesome peace food center in southern Styria- we always try to build synergies.
There's fasting and the CRP value goes down, so the immune system improves. We also have a green smoothie, which is also an immune booster. Halfway through the fast, I take thisRechtsregulat, a fourfold fermented concoction that the symbionts love so much.After the fast, for some of those who need it, there is a kind of symbiosis steering by adding a few good symbionts that they might need.
But during the fast we also go on hikes, for example. Fasting hikes every day anyway.Hiking, the exercise, isalso demonstrablygood.And thenwe usually also hikein the forest. Tamanga lies between two forests. We can go hiking in the woods a lot. Then wealsohave the opportunity towalk barefootonthemountain pastures, which makes the antioxidants more effective and better than usual.
We are also not afraid of the sun. We leave that to the dermatologists to scare us. They have already causeda lot of suffering and damage for which they are responsible. We need the sun,not just prudence - in afigurative sense. We need the sun because it makes the most biologically available, best hormone D. We need high hormone D levels, especially with regard to viral infections.
There is always a group that wants to sing. We have three groups on our fasting hikes.Some want to meditate in the forest. So, we can build up so many synergies.
We can do so much with sleep. Good sleep, we know, is also so important. There really are many, many things that have proven their worth on the frontline of courageous conventional medicine during the COVID-19 crisis.Doctors who no longer followed the standard program with intubation because it simply killed too many people.Who then gaveoxygen gently, like a doctor in Bavaria, in Selb. He also posted this courageously, but then had to withdraw it because he still had a perspective in conventional medicine. I think that was probably the reason.
The fact is, people use fever. And then we suddenly think of Parmenides, who says:"Give me a way to make fever and I'll cure any disease." You can't even say that today.At the time of Dr. Hindhede, there was Dr. Bircher-Benner in Switzerland. Bircher muesli is reminiscent of this. He used overheating baths to get his clinic with over 150 beds and soldiers suffering from Spanish flu through this period without losing a single one. AndresBircher, chief physician in Switzerland, now an old gentleman, but one who stands in this Bircher-Benner tradition and can really look back on his work, tells such a touching story.
I would always like to convey that to people: To live in such a waythat you can look back on it and be satisfied and at peace with it.
But the rest of us could at least see that we're doing it right and living courageously, being proactive and daring to say something.Because if we look at the whole issue, it's an infection, a war between the immune system and the pathogens. If we don't want this to sink into the body, just as we prefer to live our growth in a figurative sense, that it sinks into the body, the tumor growth. Then it would be good for us to have our arguments. We dare to say:"I disagree withyou." A wholelarge group:"I disagree." I fully agree with them. On all points. I don't even know them, but I disagree with what they're saying. That's also something that's good for my soul.
Of course, I'm then denigrated and insulted, but there's also something funny about being verbally abused as a hippie and a '68er. I wasn't that left-wing back then. But never mind, I was used to that. Now you're being called aright-wingextremist. As a corona denier. For God's sake: How can you deny a virus as a doctor? And as a conspiracy theorist. There's something funny about that. They're just scared. They can't help themselves. They're just [unintelligible] wild. It's sad that newspapers like Die Zeit and Süddeutsche have nothing other than such cheap projections. Where you realize they havenothing to offer apart from denigration.

Psychosomatics and the gut

JuliaYes, yes. It's easier to just label someone than Conspiracy theorists or, even worse, right-wing radicals. Of course, you can silence someone very quickly with that. Not everyone, but ...
I'd like to finish - we've really talked about a lot of things - what you can do, what you can actively do. You've listed so many great things, and everyone can do them at home. Of course, I think it's great to go on a fasting week or something like that. We can also briefly mention at the end where people can find it.
But you can also go into the forest at home. You can also go barefoot at home. You can sing. They listed so many things that are really, really practical and that everyone can do immediately. Now we knowss I know that many of my listeners are also listening because they have bowel problems, because they have a digestive issue somewhere.issue somewhere. That's why I would like to ask them if they can perhaps say something more about this, about the bowel and perhaps also from a psychosomatic point of view.perspective. What is connected to the gut?

Dr. Dahlke: I can say something about that. I have to admit that this is nothing different.
The gut is there to help us digest our lives. The Buddhists say so beautifully"practicingboga""eating the world". We have to harvest what we have done in the past. We also have to absorb it. We have to digest it, learn to deal with it. For people in the East, Buddhists,Hindus, this is a matter of course. I think we also have to digest life, and it is becoming difficult for more and more people to digest.

It has to taste good!

Irritable bowel syndrome. We've been dealing with this for ages. Nowit'scalled "leaky gut syndrome". Butfrom my point of view, the answer isrelatively similar: a period of fasting to give it a rest. And then to start a sensible diet. If someone really has intestinal problems, I wouldn't just say plant-based wholefood peace food, but differentiate more.
There is a dietby an American surgeon called Gundry.I data-contrast="auto">in this dietyou are allowed almost nothing. He wrote a book about bad vegetables, although he essentially only recommends vegetables, based on a few vegetables. I did this diet once for four weeks. It was unspeakably tasteless.One of my colleagues onthe fasting hike stopped after two weeks because it simply didn't taste good. Eating almost nothing simply doesn't taste good.
We then turned it around, the opposite so to speak: do a week of fasting - five days or so - and then slowly build up. Anyone with intestinal problems would think: look, the potato - potatoes, let's say in Austria - doesn'thave a long tradition. We're not used to them. Think about dairy products. We've known them for 12,000 years. It originated in Sumeria, in the land of the two rivers.So far, only about 50 percent of the world's population has switched to producing enough lactase to process lactose - the milk sugar. 12,000 years is nothing for evolution. And now potatoes: Columbus arrived in 1492.And then it took 100 years for Sir Walter Raleigh to export the potato to England. That brings us to 1592, 1600 practically. It took a long time for it to come to us from England because it was thought to be poisonous, as a nightshade plant. We only have a few hundred years of experience with potatoes.
So after fasting, start with a jacket potato and see if you can tolerate it well. Thank goodness, most people will tolerate it. I also tolerated them and still like them. And then carry on. The same goes for peppers. The same goes for corn. It's the same with quinoa, amaranth ... they don't have gluten, but we're not familiar with them. There are relatively many things:tomatoes. Tomatoes are a nightshade plant. We don't have much experience. The joke, the difference to the Gundry diet is that it'sfun to add things bit by bit after fasting and always feel:"Can I even tolerate you?"
For example, I realized that I can tolerate eggplants thank goodness, but not peppers. I've always eaten a lot of them. They're so colorful: red, orange, yellow, green. That turned me on. But it doesn't agree with me at all. Then I left it out for three or four months and then started very slowly. Now I can tolerate it too.
So give your intestines a real rest. Reflection time. Regeneration. And then gently feel together with it: What can I tolerate? I have described this in detail in thebig Peace Food book.It's called"Thebig peace food book". The one with the apple on the front. With recipes.

The food has to taste good too.

Julia: Absolutely! That's very, very important.

Dr. Dahlke: If it doesn't taste good, it won't work.

JuliaNo.

Dr. Dahlke: That's important. So, these are the tastiest, best recipes and you can build up wonderfully with them and see: What do I tolerate well? And after a year you will be able to tolerate most of it well. And"leakygut" will have closed the holes again.
What youunder no circumstances I can tell you right away - is milk and dairy products. They simply have to go. If you want to give your gut a chance and want to continue consuming dairy products, then you need a doctor other than me.I give up on that. It's not going to work.
If you want to get rid of your allergy, you have to get out of dairy.Even if it'sdifficultat first.There are so many other milks: oat milk, rice milk, almond milk. During our training, Peace Food Nutrition Trainer, there were twelve types of milk and you could choose - without knowing which one was which - what you liked best.
We have so many options. I would also do a water test. You have toyour find your water.

JuliaExactly. That's what I always say.

Dr. Dahlke: We have a test with ten or eleven water samples. These are just the seven from St. Leonhard's, they're all good.Dann you can take a few home-prepared ones, from your local source or something like that.If you don'tknowwhat's in it, seewhich one tastes best to you. It has proved very effective.
And psychosomatics, I've written a whole bookabout that. Digestive problems. You can also read that.

JuliaYes, that might be very, very exciting.

Dr. Dahlke: I mean, that's old. I wrote it in 1989. But it says that cholesterol is nonsense. Now there's also the movie"The Cholesterol Lie". So, that's a wrong track.

Julia: But basically it doesn't change with psychosomatics. What's behind it. Whether you wrote this 20 years ago or today, it would probably still be similar.

Dr. Dahlke: Leaky gut isn't in there yet because the word didn't even exist in my vocabulary. But irritable bowel syndrome. Conventional medicine is constantly rediscovering ancient things, renaming them and pretending to have discovered them.
Fasting doctors like me have been talking about intestinal flora for many decades. The [unintelligible] talked about it. The Buchingers talked about it.Fahrner talked about it. There are many before me, wonderful doctors who were fasting doctors. Now, since - much, much too late - conventional medicine has discovered this, it's just the microbiome. It doesn't matter. Let's forgive them this self-insecurity. They already realize that they are often too late.
When it came to the connection between the immune system and the psyche, they were a few millennia too late, behind the shamans. That's why they called it particularly sophisticated: psycho-neuro-immunology. But let's be glad that it exists. That's why Ms. Gruber and I can tell you that fear reduces the immune system. The psyche and the immune system have something to do with each other. I find it a bit ridiculous, these pompous names that are always thrown out by conventional medicine. They actually have a sense of inferiority, I think, otherwise they wouldn't do something like that and claim that they've discovered it. That's a joke!
It's a bit like journalists, when they come up with such killer arguments, it means they have no arguments.You can almost see it as a commendation. If you're not being portrayed as a conspiracy theorist today, you're not thinking clearly.

Julia: You can see it like this.

Complementary medicine instead of alternative medicine

Dr. Dahlke: There is complementary medicine. We complementary physicians don't want to abolish conventional medicine. I don't use the word"alternative medicine" at all. We want to complement it. It desperately needs that. That would do it a lot of good. The goal is holistic medicine. That includes everything. But I also have to say to us naturopaths: conventional medicine is also part of it.

JuliaEverything. Exactly.

Dr. Dahlke: That's what we say. You can't heal, you can't bring healing by cutting away and suppressing. You have to add something. That's why we ask doctors or naturopaths who have a deeper understanding:"What's wrong with you?" And then the patients tell us what they have. From this we can then use the interpretation of illness,"illness as a symbol", with this reference book to find out from the symptoms what the underlying principles are.

Julia: I don't think many people necessarily want to hear that. They would prefer to just have a pill or something that can fix it."away". So do many of the patients and clients. Would you really say that a healthy diet and intestinal cleansing alone, without looking at the psyche, is the only way to achieve sustainable health? Or is it really necessary to tackle difficult issues or to look at them: What is the underlying issue?

Dr. Dahlke: I tend towards synergy. To psychosomatics.

JuliaExactly. Both.

Vegans are more intelligent

Dr. Dahlke: I have to say, a lot of young people have become fans of peace food and so on. If you eat better and your blood circulation improves - not just in your gut, also in your brain - then you can think better. And if you can think better, you are simply more alert, more awake. Then thoughts don't come to you with difficulty, they come easily. You see through the connections more.
There are also studies on this.We have masses of studies on whole plant-based nutrition, peace food. There are studies that show that if you eat this diet, the urge to exercise increases. You can see this with mice and hamsters, which then work more in the wheel. But there is also evidence, studies that show that people then move more and, in my experience, mentally too.

JuliaYes, that's my experience too.

Dr. Dahlke: There are also studies that say vegans are more intelligent. In all studies where this is asked in passing, the result is that vegans are simply more intelligent. Wejust don't know:is it because the intelligent ones go vegan first, or is it because when you go vegan, you become more intelligent? You will, because your blood circulation simply improves. This"money roll phenomenon", whenthe red blood cells have to squeeze through the capillaries and the blood flow is rather stagnant. Conventional medicine also likes to prescribe blood thinners, which entails a risk of bleeding. We advise quite naturally in this direction.

Julia: Whereby, we probably can't open this barrel now, otherwise the conversation will be much, much too long.
From my experience, it's also the case that people who don't eat a vegan diet, but who are actually simply anti-inflammatory, really watch their sugar levels etc., also achieve a lot of positive effects. It simply has to be really high-quality food and also high-quality animal products.
I give youcompletely right about dairy products. It really is something that many people absolutely cannot tolerate and should leave out.
On the other hand, I have now found with my clients that even a change to a really mindful diet and a high-quality, organic diet with attention to sugar levels, insulin secretion etc. also has these positive effects.
Many of my customers - although they do not eat a purely plant-based diet - have a better CRP value, have actually have better cholesterol levels, better uric acid levels etc. etc. and actually describe all these positive effects as well:"I have more energy." -"I am in a better mood." etc.
That might be an exciting topic for another conversation, so that we can really say: Mo it have to be purely plant-based? Os it also possible to achieve positive effects with animal products?

Dr. Dahlke: Of course there is. No question about it. Relatively speaking, things always get better when youimprove something.It is certainly the case that an organic calf is in better shape than amass-producedone. But they are not stroked to death either. The stress is pretty similar. They are even less prepared for the horror that is to come. That's very clear to me, of course.
When children have an allergy, the first thing they have to do is stay away from milk. I can't expect the parents to switch to completely peace food, i.e. whole plant-based and vegan. But in my experience, the whole thing is generally much more beneficial.
There are also studies. The healthiest people in the world are the Adventists in California, in the town of Loma Linda. The women there are over 91 on average, the men over 89. Their religious founder has prescribed that they eat a whole plant-based, fresh diet right from the start. But someof thembecame vegetarians over time. They then have a life expectancy that is no longer as high as that of the original"pure eaters".Others have given up completely. They live an American lifestyle: hot dogs, fast food. Their life expectancy is just as bad, ten years less. You can see that a bit: You can always increase it.
But that's what I would advise. I wouldn't advise anyone to say I'm going vegan for the rest of my life. I would always advise that:Try it for a quarter of a year. Start as a flexitarian and see how you feel. It's relatively easy with athletes. They can measure it. Watch a movie like"Game Changers data-contrast="auto" >" by James Cameron, who made"Titanic" and"Avatar". There you can see: The top athletes today are vegans.
I've just heard from a top chef thathalf of FC Bayern eat vegan. They just have to perform at their best. You can measure it there too, with athletes. It's nice to start on the right path. You need to take the first step. It's right to leave out certain things that are certainly harmful to you.
On the other hand, for me as a doctor, the question:"How many button mushrooms can I eat without dying?"is a bit ridiculous. Of course, that's something too. They contain a few vitamins, phytochemicals and minerals. I would just leave out what is really harmful. Iknow from a study by the Swiss government, i.e. the state, that 93% of toxins come from animal protein. This includes toxins such as dioxin and so on. Then I wouldn't take it, animal protein. I wouldn't want to eat or do anything harmful, poisonous or dangerous.
But of course I can approach it. If I know that 47 percent -so if that's 100 percent,93 percent - then 47 percent of that is from dairy products alone. And then 22 percent from fish. Because fish, these are predatory fish, they are very contaminated. AndXX percent (?) from meat. Although we eat much more meat than fish.So you see, if you eat a Wiener schnitzel or Zürcher Geschnetzeltes from time to time, it doesn't do as much damage to the environment as eating yoghurt. Most people don't even realize that.

Julia: But it's definitely important - and I think that's perhaps another good quintessence: you always have to look: Where does someone stand? What are the problems that someone has? That's why I hate the question when someone asks:"What is a healthy diet?" It depends on who you're talking to and where the prerequisite is, and whether the person is already ill or whether they are healthy. It also depends on whether I'm talking to someone who has a lot of stress or a lot of grief or someone who leads a balanced life. That's why I think it's very, very important to look and differentiate: Where is someone in the process?

Dr. Dahlke: Yes, for example, whether he leads an active life and is very active and burns fat.

Julia: Yes, also still. Exactly.

Dr. Dahlke: It's all much more stressful in a swivel chair. You don't burn anything there.

Julia: Thank you very much! We've really covered a lot of ground and I'm sure we've also covered a lot,that people can really take away with them and implement immediately.
If anyone would like to find out more about you: I knowssthat you have a podcast. It's calledsst "Life Change School Podcast". What else is there? What else can we recommend?

Dr. Dahlke: The homepagewww.dahlke.at. You can find me on Telegram. I post something there from time to time.

JuliaSuper. And lots of books. I think that's over 70? Are there that many?

Dr. Dahlke: 74. That's not entirely clear either. I didn't write all of them alone.For example, I wrote about gynecology with Volker Zahn, a professor of gynecology. He didn't write it at all, but we discussed it for ages. He had been a gynecologist for decades. Together with Margit, my first wife, for example, Iwrote"Hollywood therapy", what feature films reveal to us,together with her andreally written together too. So, it's not that easy to say anymore.
It's always important to pick yourself up where you are. You won't need all 70. There's no need to be scared.

JuliaOf course. But I will definitely link to the book about the gut. Everyone can then continue their search. I think that if youat a bookseller of your choice "Dahlke" you will find a lot of things there. Or is there a book that you might recommend as an introduction? can?

Dr. Dahlke: If you want to get into the theory and interpretation of illness, it's"Illness as a symbol". That has almost 800 pages. If it's nutrition, then it would be"Peace Food". If it's philosophy, this way of thinking, then it would be"Laws of Fate". He can also find it in"Illness as a Symbol", where it's all there, but shorter.

JuliaGreat. Thank you very much, and thank you for taking so much time for us. I wish you all the best, even in these turbulent times, and look forward to staying in touch.

Dr. Dahlke: Yes, on that note, thank you for listening.

The links to the episode are:
Life Change School Podcast:https://lebenswandelschule.com/podcast/
Website:www.dahlke.at

Now I encourage you to subscribe to the podcast so you don't miss an episode, and if you like what you hear, I really appreciate a review on iTunes or Apple Podcast. Because these reviews also help other people find the podcast so we can spread the knowledge about gut and health more.